How do you handle situations where you encounter contradictory legal information?
Theme: Skills Role: Legal Researcher Function: Legal
Interview Question for Legal Researcher: See sample answers, motivations & red flags for this common interview question. About Legal Researcher: Conducts in-depth research on legal issues, statutes, and case law to support legal arguments and decision-making. This role falls within the Legal function of a firm. See other interview questions & further information for this role here
Sample Answer
Example response for question delving into Skills with the key points that need to be covered in an effective response. Customize this to your own experience with concrete examples and evidence
- Assessing the contradictory information: I would carefully review and analyze the contradictory legal information to understand the nature and extent of the contradictions
- Identifying the sources: I would identify the sources of the contradictory information, such as statutes, regulations, case law, or legal opinions
- Evaluating credibility & authority: I would assess the credibility and authority of each source to determine their reliability and relevance in resolving the contradictions
- Researching primary sources: I would conduct thorough research on primary legal sources, such as statutes and regulations, to identify any relevant provisions that may help clarify the contradictions
- Examining secondary sources: I would consult secondary legal sources, such as legal treatises, law review articles, or expert opinions, to gain insights and interpretations that may shed light on the contradictory information
- Seeking guidance from colleagues or supervisors: If necessary, I would seek guidance from experienced colleagues or supervisors to discuss the contradictory information and benefit from their expertise
- Applying legal reasoning & analysis: I would apply legal reasoning and analysis to reconcile the contradictory information, considering factors such as legislative intent, precedent, and the overall legal framework
- Documenting findings & conclusions: I would document my findings, including the contradictory information, the sources consulted, and the reasoning used to resolve the contradictions
- Communicating findings: I would effectively communicate my findings and conclusions to relevant stakeholders, such as attorneys, clients, or colleagues, ensuring clarity and transparency
- Continuing professional development: I would actively engage in ongoing professional development to stay updated with legal developments and enhance my ability to handle contradictory legal information effectively
Underlying Motivations
What the Interviewer is trying to find out about you and your experiences through this question
- Problem-solving skills: Ability to analyze and resolve conflicting information
- Attention to detail: Ability to identify inconsistencies and discrepancies
- Research skills: Capability to verify and validate legal information
- Adaptability: Capacity to adjust research approach and seek clarification
Potential Minefields
How to avoid some common minefields when answering this question in order to not raise any red flags
- Lack of attention to detail: Not mentioning the importance of verifying sources and cross-referencing information
- Inability to handle ambiguity: Not discussing the ability to analyze and interpret conflicting information
- Lack of problem-solving skills: Not mentioning strategies to resolve contradictory legal information